Fat Burners: The
Unadulterated Truth
By Tom Venuto
www.BurnTheFat.com
QUESTION: Dear Tom, I am not
currently using any fat burners. However, in many magazines
where I see advertisements for fat burners, they always
have a model with a six-pack and the headline is something
like, “It takes more than training and nutrition to get a
six-pack.” Once a person hits a plateau, do we really need
fat burners to achieve that “ripped” or “six-pack” look? I
am having a really hard time getting my stomach to look the
way I want it, and I really respect your opinion, so I
appreciate your thoughts on this. Thanks Tom!
ANSWER:
The short and
sweet answer is NO, you do not ever “need” fat
burners.
While I won’t
dismiss the fact that there are some ingredients in some “fat
burner” products that might help a little bit, I take great
displeasure in seeing those kinds of misleading headlines as
well as the misleading use of models who are often paid to
endorse the product even though they may never have even used
it (they’re just models!)
Many “fat
burner” companies have been sued by the Federal Trade
Commission for false advertising, false claims and falsifying
before and after photos.
The best you get is a slight thermogenic
effect and possibly some slight appetite suppression. A few
products might work through other mechanisms like improving
thyroid, but if you forgive me the generalization, I
consider the effects of all these “fat burner” products to
be minutia. In a previous newsletter, I wrote that in my
opinion, 97% of your results come from nutrition and
training and maybe you get an extra 3% advantage from
supplements.
Just so you know
those numbers arent something I just pulled out of thin air,
lets take an example:
I have reviewed scientific data that
EGCG, the active ingredient in green tea
extract, if consumed in enough quantity, could
increase thermogenesis / metabolic rate by an average of
about 75 calories in 24 hours. Since ephedrine was taken
off the market, green tea extract appears in many
ephedra-free formulas these days. What is a typical calorie
expenditure for an active male in 24 hours? lets say 2700
calories per day. 75/2700 = 2.7%. That slight little extra
doesnt hurt, especially when its delivered in a healthful
package such as green tea, rather than central nervous
system stimulants, but its minutia in the bigger picture.
Another way to put this into perspective is to make a list
of what other things would burn 75 calories (for 150 lb
person:)
- walk your dog for 15
minutes
- three times a day, walk for 5
minutes at normal casual pace
- 30 minutes of ironing
- bagging leaves and grass clippings
for 14 minutes
- re arrange your furniture for 10
minutes
- wash your car, 15
minutes
- vacuuming for 15 minutes
- 7.2 minutes of walking up stairs
(could be spread throughout the day)
Ah yes, but why
move your body when you can take the pill and metabolism
increases while you sit and watch TV? How about for your
health? A body that is not moved, rots away. Unlike a car which
only has so many miles on it and wears out from over-use,
people are the only “machines” on earth that fall apart from
under-use.
Here’s what any
good personal trainer will always tell you: No amount of
calorie restriction or pill-popping will ever give you FITNESS.
It willl never give you STRENGTH. it will never get you
MUSCULARITY. It will never give you FUNCTIONALITY. At best it
will help you reduce body mass slightly.
On one hand, I’m
tempted to say that everything counts and that yes, 75 calories
here, and 75 calories there, it ALL adds up, because it does.
After you’re exercising regularly and all your fundamentals are
in place, details and little things do matter.
I’m simply
asking you to put the benefits of any fat burners in proper
perspective and realize that (1) there is no “need” for taking
them and (2) the claims made in the ads are often erroneous or
exagerrated.
My advice on fat burners:
1. NEVER buy
a fat burner unless you get independent verification of the
claims made for the product.
How do you KNOW they really work? Are
you SERIOUSLY going to take the advertisers word for it?
Are you SERIOUSLY going to take someone else’s testimonial
as fact? Get verification for yourself by going to the pub
med data base and looking for research (try
www.ReleMed.com too, as their search results are very thorough
and relevant and they provide links to the pub med
citations).
2. Put it in
perspective
With those products that work, such as
those providing a small thermogenic effect, put that in
perspective as compared to how easily you could burn that
many calories with even light exercise like walking or
housework. Keep in mind the additional fitness and strength
benefits you will obtain from exercise as opposed to doing
nothing and popping a pill.
3. See if
there are any side effects or health warnings.
With all supplements and especially with
prohormones or stronger thermogenics like the ephedrine and
caffeine stack, (if you still have access to them),
understand the risk to benefit ratio, and be certain you
know the dangers and contraindications.
4. Read the
label and see if the product contains enough active ingredient
to even work.
A classic scam is when a “fat
burner”product quotes research that a certain inredient
boosts metabolism, which might be true. What they may not
tell you is that all the research with positive results
used a large dosage of the ingredient, which might not be
cheap. So the supplement company includes a “pinch” or
“light dusting” of that ingredient just so they can say
it’s in the bottle, even though its nothing more than
“label decoration.” Then they have the audacity to invoke
the research studies in their advertisements when the
amount of the ingredient in their product is no where near
what was used in the research!
5.
Proprietary blend scam.
Some companies,
DONT LET YOU SEE how much ingredient is in the product formula,
because it contains multiple ingredients and they say their
formula is a “trade secret” aka “proprietary”, so they list
WHAT is in the product but not HOW MUCH. If you don’t know how
much is in there then how are we (the consumers) supposed to
get independent confirmation of the facts and analyze whether
this product is any good?
6. Make sure
there is human research, not just rodent
research.
In many cases, advertisements cite
studies on rats and mice as “proof” under the assumption
that the product will produce the same results in humans.
Animal research is an important part of the scientific
method, as it is often used to help find areas of research
where human study should be pursued, or in the other
direction, to trace back the mechanism that makes something
work. However, for obesity research in particular, a
positive finding in rats does not mean the same thing will
happen in humans.
7. Look for
more than one human study.
Consider trying a supplement after it
has human research that has been replicated by different
research groups which are not industry-sponsored. My policy
is that I will usually only give a “buy” rating to a
supplement when a product has an intitial well-designed
human controlled trial published and then similar research
has been replicated by another research group that is not
supplement-industry funded.
Actually, I
think it’s a good thing that nutrition and supplement companies
fund and sponsor some of the research. They should. They should
not only back up their claims with published clinical trials,
they should share some of the cost of this expensive
research.
However, a basic principle of the
scientific method is replication. Other researchers should
be able to duplicate the findings. Therefore, while the
funding source does not necessarily prove bias, if there is
only one study available on a supplement and it is company
or industry sponsored, I usually take it with a grain of
salt and put an asterisk next to it while I wait for
confirmation from another study. (You might be surprised at
how IN-frequently this type of confirmation occurs).
Do you REALLY
need “more” than nutrition and exercise??????
Now, when you weigh the fact that even
the products with research backing them only help a little,
with the fact that many of the ads lie to you about
research, exagerrate claims and hide vital information
about ingredients, and with the fact that you can do a few
more minutes of exercise per day and get the same results
for free, how enthusiastic are you about fat burners? Yeah,
that’s why I’m not real excited about them either and based
on the fact that I use no drugs and no “fat burner”
supplements and I compete in bodybuilding - very
successfully - I’d say that the assertion, “it takes more
than nutrition and exercise to get six pack abs” is
patently false.
Train hard and
expect success,
Tom
Venuto www.burnthefat.com

About the Author:
Tom Venuto is a natural bodybuilder, certified strength and
conditioning specialist (CSCS) and a certified personal
trainer (CPT). Tom is the author of "Burn the Fat, Feed The
Muscle,” which teaches you how to get lean without drugs or
supplements using methods of the world's best bodybuilders
and fitness models. Learn how to get rid of stubborn fat
and increase your metabolism by visiting: www.burnthefat.com
|